For product managers
Sign off on what the code does.
Check the AI explanation in Slack against what you meant to ship. Your sign-off stays with the exact commit you reviewed.
Release decision · PR #207
Clarify workspace role invitations · 2 files changed
Scope
Workspace invitations now explain when a teammate is pending.
Invite copy names the workspace and selected role before acceptance.
Side effects
Pending invites stay visible to workspace admins.
Existing members and accepted invites keep their current access.
One question
Does an invited teammate know what access they will receive?
Discuss the answer in Slack before putting your name on the approval.
Illustrative brief · decision remains human
Product’s lane in review
Check the behavior against the product intent.
Use the explanation and code references to discuss what the change does. Keep testing and merging with engineering.
Business logic approval
Confirm that the behavior matches the release intent and the customer promise.
- Scope matches the launch
- Customer-facing copy is accurate
- Rollout dependency is understood
Engineer checks
Keep testing with engineering. GitHub branch protections still apply.
- Engineers verify tests
- Side effects are named
- Open implementation risk is explicit
The question worth answering
“Does the invite explain the access this teammate will receive?”
Talk through the intended behavior in Slack before approving. Leave your reasoning in the thread so the team can look back at the decision.
Scope
Which customer promise changed?
Side effects
Where else will this behavior appear?
Decision
What does the team still need from a person?
Record a decision on the behavior.
Start a 14-day trial. No card required. Choose your approvers and try the AI explanation on your next PR.